arXiv preprint ·
Where Does Jagged Competence Come From?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Capable systems often show jagged competence: low average error alongside failures on particular inputs. We ask where it comes from in a task built from two known layers. A lower layer A computes five per-slot sums from records; an upper layer B uses the slot-1 sum and a mode carried over from earlier boards to predict the next board's category, so B cannot be computed from the current A alone: B is a strict extension of A. We train small recurrent networks on B and measure, against exact ground truth, what they acquire of A. The central finding is that learning B gives the network a jagged version of A, measured through probe readability and supervised outputs. It is readable where B needs it (slot 1, 97-98% by a linear probe) and becomes less readable where B does not (the other slots, 5-10%); category misreads concentrate near the slot-1 cutoffs; and when A is trained explicitly it comes out only approximately right. The networks show jagged competence in B: natural KL below $3\times10^{-4}$ bits coexists with a maximum law TV of about 0.25 on constructed histories. Matched experiments show that even a good A is not enough: connecting a learned A to B cuts misreads 1.3 to 17-fold, the same exact A gives fewer misreads as one-hot inputs (0-2) than as numerical inputs (10-317), one B update makes an exact A inexact unless the B gradient is blocked, and exact A still leaves some B failures. In this task, uneven acquisition, access and preservation of the lower theory explain part of the jagged competence of a network that learns the theory built on it; some failures remain unexplained. Whether the same holds in larger systems is a test to run.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Seer: Maximum Likelihood Regression for Learning-Speed Curves
Mitigating Over-squashing without Rewiring: A Sheaf Effective Resistance Perspective
Scale-Recursive Rectified Flows for Few-Step Precipitation Ensembles
How RL Reshapes LLM Reasoning: Transferability, Coverage, and Scaling Laws
What Is Lost in Post-Training? Default Collapse and the Loss of In-Context Steerability Across Diverse Perspectives
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.