arXiv preprint ·
From Requirements to Attack Trees: Grounded LLM Agents for Design-Time Security Review
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Design-level security weaknesses can arise from requirements, trust assumptions, missing controls, and data flows before implementation begins. Existing security practices often identify these issues after code is written. We present a multi-agent LLM framework for design-time security analysis from product requirement documents and architecture diagrams. The proposed framework parses architecture diagrams into graph representations, generates misuse and failure cases, constructs attack trees, checks governance and compliance gaps, recommends mitigations, assigns enterprise security-domain tags, and produces a candidate revised architecture recommendation for expert review. The framework does not retrieve from Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) databases at inference time. Instead, it analyzes system behavior, trust boundaries, component interactions, and data-flow assumptions. Misuse cases act as intermediate representations that link findings to system components and attack paths, while a validation and refinement loop filters unsupported findings and improves grounding, traceability, and actionability. We evaluate the framework on a Microsoft reference-labeled threat-modeling example, labeled synthetic PRD--architecture pairs, and two open-ended systems: Berty and Gas Town. The reference-labeled case supports threat-recovery and actionability analysis, while the open-ended cases evaluate validity, noise, traceability, actionability, redundancy, and attack-tree quality. Results show that architecture-informed, misuse-driven reasoning improves review quality compared with single-shot and ablation baselines. Keywords: LLM Multi-Agent Systems, Design-Time Security, Threat Modeling, Vulnerability Discovery, Architecture Diagrams, Security Analysis, Misuse Case Derivation, Attack Trees, Iterative Reasoning, Security Governance.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Where Quantum Fourier Sampling Stops Short: A Three-Gate Audit Protocol for Delay-PUF Security Models
Language Model Fingerprinting Requires Rethinking Watermark Teachers
When Normalization Selects the Sign: Auditing Robustness Ablations in Quantum Attention
Self-Reflection Fine-Tuning: Enhancing Agent Security against Prompt Injection Attacks from Failure Experience
Differential Privacy of Gradient Descent on Perturbed Objectives
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.