arXiv preprint ·
Image-Based Breast Implant Detection for Mammography Dataset Curation and Near-Real-Time Deployment: Comparing Foundation Models and Task-Specific Convolutional Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
To evaluate the performance-feasibility tradeoffs of foundation models (FMs) and task-specific convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained from scratch for breast implant classification in 2D mammography, with emphasis on suitability for near real-time clinical deployment. Methods: We evaluated four models: two FMs (RAD-DINO and MammoCLIP) and two CNNs trained from scratch for implant prediction (ResNet18 and our lightweight ResNetLite). Using the Emory Breast Imaging Dataset, 5,000 unilateral screening mammograms were used for training/validation and 1,000 manually reviewed unilateral images were held out for testing. For the FMs, global image embeddings from the pretrained encoder were classified using a support vector machine (SVM). The CNNs were trained end-to-end on 2D mammograms, with ResNetLite optimized via grid search over depth and width to balance accuracy and efficiency. Performance was evaluated using AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, embedding visualization, and inference-latency. Results: All models demonstrated strong performance on held-out test data (n = 1,000). MammoCLIP achieved the highest AUROC (0.999) with the quickest training time of 493 seconds. RAD-DINO achieved the highest sensitivity (0.980; accuracy 0.989) but had the slowest inference and training times. ResNet18 and MammoCLIP achieved comparable accuracy (0.985). ResNetLite showed no statistically significant difference from ResNet18 (AUROC 0.993; accuracy 0.976) despite using only 1.4% of ResNet18's parameters, and had the fastest inference time. Conclusion: FMs and task-specific CNN models reliably detect breast implants on 2D mammography. Model selection is best guided by deployment context: MammoCLIP for GPU-equipped hospital settings requiring scalable integration, and lightweight CNNs such as ResNetLite for resource-constrained or edge deployments.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Image & Video Processing
End-to-End Autonomous Recursive Arborescence Deformable Flow and Non-Linear Hemodynamics for Patient-Specific Coronary Centerline Extraction
Structured Population Models for Follicular Development
Hybrid Context Forests and Bilateral Viterbi Matching for 3D Rib Centerline Tracing in CT
Physiologically Informed Digital Auscultation for Pneumonia Detection in Long-term Care Residents
MP-MNCA: Morphology-Prior Masked Neighbor Cross-Attention for Efficient Spatial Domain Identification
Get the few papers worth your time in Image & Video Processing every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.