arXiv preprint ·
Threat-Preserving Representation Sensitivity in Agent-Security Benchmarks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Security benchmarks for LLM-based agents often report the attack success rate (ASR) as a measure of model robustness and use these scores to compare different models and defense mechanisms, assuming that they describe the security of the agent. In this paper, we explore whether it also influences the benchmark's measurement. To measure the effect of the benchmark representation, we introduce threat-preserving representation sensitivity (TPRS), which measures how much the ASR changes when we change the agent-visible representation while holding the underlying task, harmful action, security policy, ground truth, environment, and the evaluation criteria fixed. On Agent Security Bench (ASB), replacing threat-related tool names with threat-neutral names raises the committed attack success rate by 11.67 percentage points on GPT-5-mini and by 13.21 points on Claude Haiku 4.5. On MCPTox, replacing the original neutral tool name with an explicit threat-related name lowers the ASR by 11.00 percentage points on GPT-5-mini and 4.11 points on Claude Haiku 4.5. On AgentDojo, adding threat-related wording to the attack-relevant tool changes ASR by only 0.50 percentage points on GPT-4o-mini, yet the benign utility falls by 5.36 points on tasks requiring that tool. We ran an experiment on MCPTox where we observed that a threat-neutral name matched on token count, length, and casing reproduces most of the shift produced by the threat-explicit name (8.54 of 11.00 points on GPT-5-mini). The results show that a security score measured under one representation may fail to generalize across threat-preserving representations of the same security problem. Robustness claims should therefore be supported by performance across a controlled set of threat-preserving representations rather than relying on a single representation-dependent score.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Where Quantum Fourier Sampling Stops Short: A Three-Gate Audit Protocol for Delay-PUF Security Models
Language Model Fingerprinting Requires Rethinking Watermark Teachers
When Normalization Selects the Sign: Auditing Robustness Ablations in Quantum Attention
Self-Reflection Fine-Tuning: Enhancing Agent Security against Prompt Injection Attacks from Failure Experience
Differential Privacy of Gradient Descent on Perturbed Objectives
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.