arXiv preprint ·
Electronic Density versus Geometry for Machine-Learned Molecular Absorption Spectra
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Molecular optical absorption spectroscopy provides a direct probe of electronic structure and is widely used for molecular identification, interpretation of photophysical behaviour, and planning of spectroscopy experiments. Calculating the absorption spectra using first-principle excited-state methods, however, is computationally demanding, at least compared to ground-state calculations, which limits their routine application across large molecular sets. Machine-learning (ML) surrogates can reduce this cost and allow rapid spectral prediction. However, their performance depends strongly on how molecular information is represented. Here, we compare using the ground-state electron density versus the molecular geometry as inputs to a ML model for predicting absorption spectra, for a training set of 6874 molecules selected from the QM7 dataset. For each of these molecules, the density was calculated using density functional theory (DFT) and the absorption spectrum was calculated using linear-response (LR) time-dependent DFT (TDDFT). Utilizing the ground-state density as the input to the ML model is motivated by the Hohenberg-Kohn and Runge-Gross theorems, and the fact that the ground-state density encodes information about bonding, charge localisation, and electronic delocalisation. Hence, it may be a more judicious starting point for the ML model compared to the geometry, as it effectively decouples the chemistry of the ground-state. The question we test is whether the benefits of using the density outweigh the (notprohibitive) penalty of requiring an additional single-point DFT calculation for the density. We find that the density-based convolutional neural network achieves a validation correlation of 0.9926, compared with 0.9795 for the best geometry-based graph model, reducing the residual decorrelation, by approximately 64%.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Chemical Physics
Equivariant Flow Matching for Electron Density Prediction
From Ground State to Electronic and Vibronic Spectra via Memory Kernel Coupling Theory and Neural Quantum States
Correlated memory effect of environment in radical-pair magnetoreception
Beyond ideal cavities: quantifying the impact of cavity dissipation on light-matter strong coupling
Quasiparticle quantum simulation of materials with the Bethe-Salpeter equation
Get the few papers worth your time in Chemical Physics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.