arXiv preprint ·
Wrong Organ, Right Physics: Transferring Echocardiography Pretraining to Lung Ultrasound for Tuberculosis Screening
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Lung ultrasound (LUS) is attractive for tuberculosis (TB) screening at primary-care level, but labelled cohorts are small. Echocardiography carries no such constraint, while sharing the same underlying ultrasound imaging physics, signal processing and B-mode appearance as LUS. We ask whether an encoder pretrained on that high-resource ultrasound domain carries representations that remain usable in the low-resource one. Only the encoder varies, across seventeen encoders spanning three architecture families. Among them, a latent-predictive video encoder pretrained on generic video (V-JEPA2-L) and its echocardiography counterpart (EchoJEPA-L) differ in pretraining corpus alone. The choice among these encoders does not resolve the classification, the whole family spanning 2.50 percentage points against a measurement resolution of 2.71. What moves the task instead is feature conditioning. Standardising the features between the encoder and the classifier improves all seventeen encoders by a mean of +1.23 percentage points at $p=1.5\times10^{-5}$. On the held-out test set every encoder selected on the development folds stands above the baseline system by up to +2.57 percentage points of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and specificity at 90% sensitivity reaches 79.3% against 60.3%. The contrast specified in advance, EchoJEPA-L against V-JEPA2-L, measures -0.16 percentage points at $p=0.926$. We therefore find no evidence that shared ultrasonic physics alone makes echocardiography a more productive pretraining corpus than generic video, and any advantage, if present, is smaller than this cohort can resolve. The video encoders receive replicated still images, however, so whether this absence of an effect reflects the pretraining domain or a video encoder applied to static frames cannot be separated. The limiting factor is the labelled cohort rather than the encoder.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Image & Video Processing
One Photon, Many Worlds: Posteriors and Predictions with Single-Photon Cameras
FloVMos: Optical Flow-based Medical Video Mosaicking
FUSEye: Training-Light Fisheye Detection with Overlapping Views and Zero-Initialized Adapters
TIRMamba: A Thermal-Prior-Modulated State-Space Network for Sub-Million-Parameter Infrared Image Super-Resolution
How well do routinely collected demographic and clinical variables aid point-of-care lung ultrasound TB classification
Get the few papers worth your time in Image & Video Processing every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.