DexJoCo-X: Benchmarking Action Representations for Multi-Hand Dexterous Manipulation

Abstract

As dexterous hands proliferate, collecting data and training policies separately for every morphology becomes increasingly impractical. Scalable cross-embodiment learning therefore requires a unified representation that captures shared manipulation structure while preserving morphology-specific control. Differences in hands, tasks, datasets, and control interfaces prevent existing studies from isolating the effects of representation, pretraining, and architecture. We introduce DexJoCo-X, a benchmark and toolkit for controlled comparison across seven representative dexterous hands, six single-arm and bimanual tasks, and 2,100 balanced demonstrations. DexJoCo-X provides a matched multi-hand, multi-task protocol with common scenes, success criteria, and execution interfaces, redesigned glove-to-hand mappings, and an automated pipeline that expands reviewed demonstrations across randomized scenes. Using $π_{0.5}$, Ego-Pi, and Being-H0.5, we examine whether a shared action interface is sufficient for multi-hand learning. Expanding $π_{0.5}$ to an 80-dimensional bimanual output yields near-zero success. Ego-Pi preserves the pretrained action head through interleaved prediction and supports per-hand multi-task learning, but remains ineffective for seven-hand joint training. By contrast, Being-H0.5 combines cross-embodiment pretraining, a unified action space, and embodiment-aware experts, enabling one policy to control all seven hands. Within this architecture, function-aligned action slots achieve 47.7% mean success, compared with 47.0% for native coordinates and 33.1% for DexLatent. These results show that cross-embodiment representation depends on the entire learning system: action coordinates, pretraining, and architecture must jointly separate shared manipulation structure from embodiment-specific control.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

More in Robotics

• arXiv preprint · 2 October 2026

  Mind the Refinement Gap: When Safe High-Level Robot Plans Produce Unsafe Executions

  Stabak Das, Priyesh Ranjan, Xiangfang Li and 1 other
• arXiv preprint · 3 October 2026

  Autoware in Construction: Gap Analysis and LiDAR Perception Toward Off-Road Autonomous Driving

  Yu Otsuki, Teja Emmey, Sena Matsushita and 2 others
• arXiv preprint · 2 October 2026

  A Passive AI System for Verifying Physical State on Automated Liquid Handlers

  Junqiong Joanne Qiu, Zeckria Kamrany, Ananya Anand and 7 others
• arXiv preprint · 3 October 2026

  CurveCodec 2: Skeleton-agnostic animation compression with a learned entropy model

  Mingyi Shi, Huancheng Lin, Xuelin Chen and 1 other
• arXiv preprint · 2 October 2026

  DeltaWorld: Physically Consistent Interactive World Simulators via Action-Conditioned Latent Increment Learning

  Boyuan Hou, Xiaoge Cao, Chaofan Zhang and 2 others

All new papers in Robotics