arXiv preprint ·
Learning a Fact Is Not Learning How to Retrieve It
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A model trained on "The capital of X is Y" may produce "Y" after "The capital of X is" but fail after "The capital of X:". We call these different ways of eliciting the same fact request forms. To separate learning a fact from retrieving it, we train two models in two stages. In the first stage (request-form training), one model sees each fact in five forms and the other sees the same facts only as statements. In the second stage (target-fact training), both receive identical training on new facts, all as statements. Both then retrieve the new facts almost equally well from statements, but differ sharply on other request forms. Thus, a model can learn how to retrieve through a request form before it learns the facts. To understand this difference, we examine the hidden state immediately before the answer, which we call the context state. When given two different request forms for the same fact, the model trained on five forms in stage one produces more similar context states than the model trained on statements alone in that stage. Changing this state at retrieval time can enable or prevent retrieval of an already learned fact, and the same effect transfers across facts and factual relations, such as capitals and currencies. To test its role during learning, we change the context state only during target-fact training. This intervention changes later retrieval without intervention at test time. Together, these results show that later retrieval depends on earlier request-form experience and the context state during fact learning.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Time Series Forecasting Benchmarks Need Scenario-Grounded Stress Testing
How RL Reshapes LLM Reasoning: Transferability, Coverage, and Scaling Laws
VERSE: Verified Self-Evolving Optimizer for Agent Harnesses
Agentic Cognitive Depth: Operational Criteria for Evaluating LLM Agents
WebUIProof: Benchmarking WebUI Code Generators with UI-Agent Execution Harness
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.