arXiv preprint ·
Peer Influence across Heterogeneous AI Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
When two AI agents disagree, who persuades whom? As multi-agent systems increasingly combine language models of different families and sizes, the answer can determine which judgments survive interaction. Measuring persuasion as the probabilistic shift in an agent's decision after a single exchange with a dissenting peer, we test seven open-weight models across three language understanding tasks. We find that persuasion is strong: when models disagree, receivers often abandon their initial judgment after seeing a peer's answer and explanation. Surprisingly, however, neither standalone certainty nor model scale reliably predicts persuasion dynamics. Models producing almost perfectly consistent decisions in isolation can be among the most susceptible to persuasion, and small models can match larger ones as persuaders and resist their influence just as effectively. Furthermore, we show that the size of the shift depends more on the susceptibility of the listener than on the persuasiveness of the speaker. Persuasion patterns are therefore specific to each model pairing, with heterogeneity amplifying persuasion in some combinations and suppressing it in others, allowing a dissenting agent running a small model to overturn the judgments of a much larger one. These findings show that the behavior of interacting models cannot be inferred from their individual properties but must be evaluated in the combinations in which they will operate.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Performance of Zero-determinant Strategies in Repeated Games without Discounting
FLAT: Smoothing the Rugged Landscape for Learnable, Sample-Efficient Traffic Calibration
All against the machine: the Solo score for rating skill in variable environments
Evaluating LLM-Generated Preference Distributions
An evolutionary origin of collective decision making in humans and machines
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.