arXiv preprint ·
Response Variability and Stability in Human Reasoning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Understanding how humans reason -- and how reasoning responses vary across tasks and individuals -- remains a core challenge for modeling and explanation in cognitive science. We investigate the stability of response patterns within reasoners and whether variation in these patterns can be used to predict learning effects. We introduce a formal, geometry-based method to quantify distances between individual reasoning patterns and their internal variability, grounded in heuristic theories. The proposed framework is tested against experimental data via generalized linear mixed-effects models and clustering, where we find that our proposed variation measure interacts with correctness to predict performance gains. Moreover, we find that reasoning patterns are stable over time within the same reasoner. The method is general enough to be applied to other reasoning domains.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Logic in Computer Science
NeuroLens: Learning Latent Embeddings of Neural Semantics from Chronic Recordings
Lightweight Semantic EEG Foundation Model for Frozen Cross-Disorder Transfer
CoHyFuse: Condition-wise Hypergraph Fusion with Global Connectome in Task-fMRI
Contrastive Neural Embeddings Reveal Individual Traits Beyond Conversational Role
From communication to computation in neurons-on-a-chip: an in silico study of neurotopomorphic computing
Get the few papers worth your time in Logic in Computer Science every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.