arXiv preprint ·
Tangent Schrödinger Bridge Matching: Learning Stochastic Transport with Mechanistic Sensitivities
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Predicting how stochastic systems respond to changes in viscosity, reaction rates, or external forces requires costly simulations, motivating reusable learned models. Yet matching observed outcome distributions does not ensure accurate intervention responses. We introduce Tangent Schrödinger Bridge Matching (Tangent-SBM), which learns stochastic transports from endpoint observations and mechanistic sensitivities. It propagates parameter derivatives alongside trajectories and supervises them against supplied targets. For average-response targets, single-rollout squared error also penalizes response variability; our objective uses two independent rollouts to match the mean without this additional penalty. We establish conditions under which sensitivity accuracy bounds finite-change prediction error and decision regret. Across Gaussian, stochastic double-well, PDEBench reaction--diffusion, and stochastic Navier--Stokes systems, Tangent-SBM improves sensitivity and finite-change prediction over matched conditional-bridge baselines while maintaining comparable endpoint and distributional accuracy. Controls examine target correctness, response objectives, and simulator-budget allocation. To test decision usefulness, we evaluate calibrated viscosity selection in Navier--Stokes: Tangent-SBM reduces tracking error relative to taking no action on every evaluated task.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Seer: Maximum Likelihood Regression for Learning-Speed Curves
Mitigating Over-squashing without Rewiring: A Sheaf Effective Resistance Perspective
Scale-Recursive Rectified Flows for Few-Step Precipitation Ensembles
How RL Reshapes LLM Reasoning: Transferability, Coverage, and Scaling Laws
What Is Lost in Post-Training? Default Collapse and the Loss of In-Context Steerability Across Diverse Perspectives
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.