arXiv preprint ·
When Can We Trust the Matching Principle? Robust Deployment Geometry Under Finite-Sample and Model Uncertainty
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Match only geometry you can identify; otherwise spread the penalty. We quantify that decision by the trust ratio tau = epsilon / gamma (estimation uncertainty over spectral separation). Under the linear-quadratic Matching response, oracle-relative drift between estimated and oracle projector matching scales as tau^2 for probes in the chosen top-r deployment subspace -- O(tau^2) in the Davis-Kahan separation region tau < 1/2, with practical usefulness depending on constants. Confidence-Calibrated Matching (CCM) turns tau into a policy -- directional when tau is small, progressively isotropic when not -- with thresholds from calibration, not from the theorem (match sits in the separation region; soft is mostly heuristic). Experiments show both regimes, including UCI HAR embeddings where always-match is worse than abstain on every cell.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Time Series Forecasting Benchmarks Need Scenario-Grounded Stress Testing
How RL Reshapes LLM Reasoning: Transferability, Coverage, and Scaling Laws
VERSE: Verified Self-Evolving Optimizer for Agent Harnesses
Agentic Cognitive Depth: Operational Criteria for Evaluating LLM Agents
WebUIProof: Benchmarking WebUI Code Generators with UI-Agent Execution Harness
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.