arXiv preprint ·
Coco: An Agentic Copilot for the Hardware--Software Co-Design Lifecycle
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Co-designing ML models and the accelerators that run them is an unusual reasoning task: architects must draw confident, high-stakes conclusions about systems that do not yet exist, and the pace of both model evolution and hardware cadence means the analysis burden grows every quarter. The evidence behind each decision--hundreds of gigabytes of fresh simulation sweeps over novel design points--is by construction absent from any LLM's pretraining corpus, and there is no external literature to retrieve; naive "chat-with-your-data" approaches hallucinate exactly where correctness matters most. We present Coco (Copilot for Codesign), an agentic platform deployed with TPU architects that accelerates the co-design lifecycle of setting up experiments, sweeping simulators, and deriving insights. Coco is built as four layers: (i) a datastore that automatically registers every simulation sweep into a normalized relational schema, so agents ground every number in a SQL query rather than scraping heterogeneous files; (ii) a library of tools with typed APIs that agents compose without human orchestration; (iii) agents that encode recurring analysis workflows--most notably iso-execution analysis, which compares systems at matched execution configurations, including swept-but-dominated points off the Pareto frontier; and (iv) a platform UX whose navigation state doubles as agent context. We report early deployment experience toward a reduction in time-to-simulation and time-to-insight, and argue that co-design is a distinct agentic domain: its data must be retrieved rather than memorized, its workflows are recurring but context-dependent, and expert adoption hinges on UX that balances IDE-style control with interactive exploration.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Programming Languages
VeriPy Source-Preserving Verification and Compatibility Checking for Python Components
Are you Synthesizing or Recalling? Evaluating LLMs on Algorithmic Code Retrieval
WAMpy: Efficient Synthesis of Prolog Programs in Python
From Verification Failures to Reusable Guidance for Coding Agents
TreeWalker: Partial Evaluation for Grouped Tree-Ensemble Inference
Get the few papers worth your time in Programming Languages every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.