arXiv preprint ·
A Safe Prototype Is Not a Safety Direction: Reference Dependence and Prompt Confounds in Response-Safety Embeddings
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Can response safety be scored by cosine similarity to the mean embedding of known-safe responses? A recent sleeper-agent detector proposes exactly this score, yet the raw positive-centroid rule is not identified: positive observations locate the safe class relative to an encoder origin, but do not determine which direction separates safe from unsafe responses. We audit the rule on two prompt-controlled, human-labeled corpora and one auxiliary jury-labeled source control, using four frozen encoders and prompt-grouped splits. On the human-labeled corpora the safe prototype reaches ROC-AUC 0.457-0.545, with two cells significantly below chance and one above, while an explicit safe-minus-unsafe reference reaches 0.588-0.738 on the same embeddings; on the jury control the prototype is inverted (0.358-0.405) and the reference reaches 0.754-0.793. At validation-calibrated 5% false-safe thresholds, the reference accepts more safe responses on PKU-SafeRLHF (0.153-0.263 versus 0.039-0.061 across encoders) and Aegis (0.189-0.291 versus 0.004-0.045), but not reliably on BeaverTails. A fully unlabeled held-out reference recovers part to most of the referenced ranking, much less when only 5% of the pool is unsafe, whereas 80-634 labeled unsafe responses recover most of it. Prompt-only ablations show that prompt-label composition can inflate uncontrolled evaluations. This is a bounded result about a raw positive centroid, not all one-class methods or safety-specialized guards. A class mean is a location, not necessarily a safety direction; a declared reference with enough unsafe mass identifies orientation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
AuraForge: Scaling Security Supervision for Training Coding Agents
Where Quantum Fourier Sampling Stops Short: A Three-Gate Audit Protocol for Delay-PUF Security Models
DeBERTa-ConPara: Attack-Aware and Deployment-Realistic Detection of AI-Generated Text
When Normalization Selects the Sign: Auditing Robustness Ablations in Quantum Attention
ABSENTIA: Detecting Broken Access Control Vulnerabilities in Web Applications
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.