arXiv preprint ·
What Makes Something Hard(er)? Explaining Question Difficulty in Natural Language
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Difficulty is one of the most fundamental properties of a question: it determines whether the question can meaningfully discriminate between models of differing ability. Although a variety of methods can now estimate or predict difficulty automatically, they yield only a single descriptive number, with no account of the underlying factors that make a question difficult in the first place. In this work, we propose a data-driven approach that automatically generates and validates natural-language hypotheses explaining what makes one question harder than another. We first estimate each item's difficulty from the responses of a large pool of LLMs using Item Response Theory. We then sample contrasting sets of easy and hard questions and prompt an LLM to propose candidate explanations of the difference, which are subsequently validated and selected on held-out questions. Experimental results across three datasets spanning mathematical, logical, and commonsense reasoning show that our method produces interpretable and predictive hypotheses. On their own, they predict the difficulty of unseen questions competitively with, or better than, advanced black-box difficulty regressors; used as additional features, they further improve those regressors, implying that they discover difficulty signals that existing models fail to capture. Moreover, we demonstrate that editing questions according to a hypothesis can shift their measured difficulty in the expected direction, indicating that the discovered hypotheses are causally valid difficulty factors rather than post-hoc descriptions. Our approach thus turns a purely descriptive difficulty score into actionable statements.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
AuraForge: Scaling Security Supervision for Training Coding Agents
Learning When to Commit from Partial Speech for End-to-End Simultaneous Speech Translation
Child-Adapted Structured Phonological Representations for Interpretable Speech Sound Analysis
VERSE: Verified Self-Evolving Optimizer for Agent Harnesses
Kinematic MeanFlow: One-Step Action Generation Policy for Robotic Foundation Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.