arXiv preprint ·
Verify Claims, Not Scores: Evidence-Based Verification of Modular Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
When developers change one component of an agent, such as its controller, a learned model or its verifier, they usually judge the change by an aggregate task score. That score cannot tell whether improvement was attainable, which component lost value, or what the agent's own checks certify. We introduce a claim-specific verification audit for modular agents that plan, act, check and refine. Instead of scoring the agent, the audit scores the evidence: each conclusion is recorded with the evidence behind it, one of four verdicts (supported, unsupported, unresolved or not evaluated) and the boundary within which it holds. Three tools supply that evidence. Oracle policies measure attainable improvement under an explicitly stated action set, so that a low value can be traced to the evaluation rather than to the environment. Replacing one component at a time with a perfect counterpart locates lost value, with null results read as unresolved whenever a downstream component could mask them. A separate test asks whether the verifier's score identifies the quantity it is read as bounding. Applied to a constrained portfolio-allocation agent in a synthetic market with known hidden regimes, the audit shows that the value of perfect regime information depends on the action set used to measure it, that the scenario generator discards most of the regime signal while better local fidelity does not improve decisions, and that the runtime verifier can be bypassed with no visible change in outcomes. The contribution is the protocol and the evidential distinctions it enforces; the empirical findings are specific to the agent and environment studied.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Cities of Signals: Compression, Separation, and the Geometry of Novelty
Multiperiod bond portfolio optimization with transaction costs using a Markov Decision process
Robust enhanced index tracking portfolio selection under distributional uncertainty
Jacobian Rank Collapse in Decision-Focused Learning
FactorBench: A Portfolio-Aware Benchmark for Automated Factor Mining
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.