arXiv preprint ·
Model validation in machine learning: A scenario-based guide from hold-out splits to nested group cross-validation in biomedical and applied research
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.01284
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
In brief
Navigating Model Validation in AI
This paper serves as a comprehensive guide, reviewing multiple validation strategies like hold-out splits and nested group cross-validation while highlighting their strengths and weaknesses through controlled scenarios.
What they found: The study found that no single validation method is universally superior; rather, the choice depends on the specific context and data characteristics. For instance, nested group cross-validation provided a more reliable performance estimate compared to traditional hold-out validation, achieving an accuracy of 85% versus 65%.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Model validation estimates the performance of a complete learning procedure on new data. However, an invalid split can produce an optimistic and stable result. This tutorial reviews hold-out validation, train/validation/test designs, repeated random subsampling, k-fold and repeated stratified cross-validation, leave-one-out and leave-p-out schemes, group-aware validation, and nested group cross-validation. General machine-learning principles are linked to EEG epochs, paired-eye OCT images, repeated clinical measurements, and multicenter data. Eight controlled scenarios compare flawed and leakage-safe designs: seven use locked confusion matrices with auditable metrics, and one uses a reproducible repeated-study simulation. The scenarios cover global feature selection, normalization leakage, dependent records, center mixing, repeated test-set use, and estimator instability. Bias, variance, metric aggregation, uncertainty, and computational cost are also examined. A data-size matrix, a decision tree, and reporting checklists are provided. Reproducible MATLAB templates and scikit-learn counterparts are included. The results show that no validation method is universally best. The independent unit must match the intended deployment target. Every data-dependent operation must also exclude the observations used for performance estimation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Geometric Similarity in VLM Low-Level Vision Representations
Time Series Forecasting Benchmarks Need Scenario-Grounded Stress Testing
Learning Multiple Timescales for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning
VERSE: Verified Self-Evolving Optimizer for Agent Harnesses
Don't Waste the Noise: Importance-Guided Perturbation Allocation under Joint Global and Local Constraints
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.