arXiv preprint ·
Feedback Without the Wait: Piloting a Generative AI Practice Platform in a Large Maths Class
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.01262
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
In brief
Instant Maths Help, With Humans in the Loop
The authors designed and piloted a generative-AI practice platform for a large mathematics class in electrical engineering. Instead of having AI grade students, the platform gives scaffolded feedback during self-directed practice, while people check the solutions in advance. The study examines student engagement, perceptions of usefulness and reliability, and lessons that may transfer to other engineering subjects.
What they found: The abstract describes a pilot of a generative-AI platform for self-directed mathematics practice in a large electrical engineering class. It says the study investigates student engagement and perceptions of the feedback’s value and reliability, but gives no numerical results or named benchmarks. As a result, the abstract supports describing the platform’s design and research aims, not claiming that it improved learning or outperformed another approach.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Timely and specific feedback is one of the strongest influences on student learning, yet it is difficult to sustain in large electrical engineering classes where the ratio of students to demonstrators is high and a learner who is stuck may wait days to find out why an approach was wrong. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) offers a way to scale conversational feedback, but using it to grade assessed work raises trust and accountability concerns, and keeping a human in the loop to assure its judgements reintroduces the very delay that erodes the value of feedback. The result is a tension between the immediacy that makes feedback so impactful and the human oversight that makes it trustworthy. In this work, we set out to resolve that tension in practice by designing and piloting a GenAI practice platform that delivers immediate, scaffolded feedback during self-directed practice. This relocates human oversight from real-time grading to the upfront verification of solutions. Our goal was to understand how students engaged with the tool, how they perceived the value and reliability of its feedback, and what lessons transfer to other engineering subjects.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Geometric Similarity in VLM Low-Level Vision Representations
Time Series Forecasting Benchmarks Need Scenario-Grounded Stress Testing
Learning Multiple Timescales for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning
VERSE: Verified Self-Evolving Optimizer for Agent Harnesses
Don't Waste the Noise: Importance-Guided Perturbation Allocation under Joint Global and Local Constraints
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.