arXiv preprint ·
Judgement in the Age of Jev: From Evaluation Scarcity to Evaluation Abundance
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence has reduced the cost of producing plausible symbolic artefacts, leading recent organisation scholarship to identify evaluation and discernment as constraints under conditions of production abundance. This perspective examines a further possibility: that machine evaluation itself becomes inexpensive enough to be deployed routinely and at scale. The investigation is prompted by Jev, TypeSafe AI's specialised model for typed probabilistic decisions. TypeSafe explicitly invokes William Stanley Jevons to argue that lower-cost machine intelligence can unlock previously uneconomic uses. Treating this as a technological provocation rather than an established empirical result, the article formulates a conditional Jevons hypothesis for machine evaluation: sufficiently large reductions in the total marginal cost of usable machine evaluation may increase its organisational consumption where latent demand is substantial and complementary costs do not dominate. The article integrates rebound economics with research on cheap prediction, production abundance, machine evaluation, decision allocation, authority, reliance and Executive Judgement to examine this possible scarcity transition. It distinguishes prediction, machine evaluation, organisational judgement and authorisation as functional activities whose costs need not fall together. Evaluations can share evidence, criteria and errors; scale mis-specified rubrics; operate on representations from which consequential qualifications have disappeared; and change practical decision rights through thresholds and exception routing. The resulting research problem is when cheap machine evaluation substitutes for human evaluative work, when it redistributes or creates demands for judgement, and how it affects the grounds available at consequential organisational commitment.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
AuraForge: Scaling Security Supervision for Training Coding Agents
Lessons from Trauma-Informed Training on Technology-Facilitated Abuse for Gender-Based Violence Advocates
Correctness, Convergence, and AI-Generated Code Detection: A Longitudinal Study of Student and Large Language Model Code in Introductory Programming
LearnAdapt Praxis: Controlled AI Assistance and Evidence Traces for Adult Workplace Learning
Scaling Peer Assessments: An Integrity Report from a Large Engineering Internship
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.