arXiv preprint ·
Supervise What Decides Success: Criterion-Aligned Auxiliary Losses for Latent World-Model Planning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Latent world models plan by scoring candidate action sequences with distances in latent space. However, task success is judged by physical quantities, which we call the success-criterion quantities. In all four latent world models we examine, the end-effector position is encoded in the latent state with an error larger than the success criterion allows. Such a latent state cannot separate successful candidates from failing ones. We propose an auxiliary loss that uses success-criterion quantities as training targets, whereas existing latent world models take them only as inputs. During training, a linear head on the encoder and predictor outputs regresses the success-criterion quantities, and the regression error is added to the training loss. The head is discarded after training, so the model, its cost, and its inputs at test time are unchanged. This loss alone improves the success rate on PushT and cube by 3.5% and 3.4% (absolute), respectively, and both improvements are statistically significant. A success criterion thus specifies what a world model must retain in its latent state, and we show that it can serve directly as a training target.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Are Frontier VLM Agents Ready to Be Robot Generalists? An Empirical Study with the Embodied Agent Arena
Mind the Refinement Gap: When Safe High-Level Robot Plans Produce Unsafe Executions
Lang3DSeg: Annotation-Free Open-Vocabulary 3D Segmentation with Point Transformers
A Passive AI System for Verifying Physical State on Automated Liquid Handlers
Kinematic MeanFlow: One-Step Action Generation Policy for Robotic Foundation Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.