arXiv preprint ·
Adapter Thickets: Splitting an RLVR Budget Beats Concentrating It
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Majority voting over sampled completions is the workhorse of test-time scaling, and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is the workhorse for making each completion better. The standard pipeline composes the two: train one policy with RLVR, then sample it many times and vote. We show that this composition is lossy. A vote can only overturn mistakes that its voters do not share, and RLVR sharpens a policy so that its samples increasingly make the same mistakes. With every method drawing exactly $160$ completions per problem, training a single LoRA adapter on the full RLVR budget raises single-sample accuracy on every model we test ($1.5$B-$8$B). Yet on three of four models it leaves the majority vote below that of the untrained base model, by up to $4.8$ points. The damage builds during training: voter errors grow steadily more correlated, and the majority vote accuracy peaks early before falling by up to $7.0$ points. The cause is concentration, not RLVR itself. We split the same data and training budget across $K$ LoRA adapters, each trained on its own random disjoint shard, and call the result an adapter thicket. Thickets out-vote the fully trained adapter in all $16$ (model, $K$) settings, and for $K{\geq}4$ they stay within $0.8$ points of the base model or above it. A single adapter stopped early, at a thicket member's step count, is a strong control that matches thickets for small $K$. For $K{\geq}8$, thickets keep more of RLVR's single-sample gain and out-vote this control in six of eight settings. The cost of concentration also grows with the number of votes: from $16$ to $160$ votes, the thicket's lead over the fully trained adapter widens from $1.3$ to $3.3$ points. When the plan is to sample and vote, an RLVR budget is better spent broad than deep.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
SmoothOperator: Enhancing Representations for Fine-grained Open-set Recognition via Modulated Label Smoothing
Seer: Maximum Likelihood Regression for Learning-Speed Curves
Fixing a Model That Learned Worse Cancer Means Lower Risk: Monotonic Constraints in Bladder Cancer Recurrence Prediction
Scale-Recursive Rectified Flows for Few-Step Precipitation Ensembles
Don't Waste the Noise: Importance-Guided Perturbation Allocation under Joint Global and Local Constraints
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.