arXiv preprint ·
Finding the Right Fit: Model-Harness Interactions across Agent Tasks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Choosing an agent system means choosing both a language model and the harness through which it acts. We ask whether a strong model, harness, or pairing stays strong when the setting changes. We evaluate 66 configurations: four configurable harnesses (OpenHands, DeepSeek Harness, PI, and openJiuwen) paired with five models on TUA-Bench, ALE-CLI, and Terminal-Bench 4, plus the native Codex-GPT and Claude Code-Claude pairings. Model rankings reverse across harnesses. On Terminal-Bench 4, Claude leads GPT by 7.94 points in OpenHands but trails it by 30.16 points in PI. For four of the five models, the best harness changes from one benchmark to another, yet some pairings hold: openJiuwen gives Kimi its highest score on all three benchmarks, by 5.61 to 11.11 points. A model's own vendor harness is not reliably its best, and higher cost does not reliably buy a higher score. On Terminal-Bench 4, GPT scores higher under PI than under DSH at less than a quarter of the cost per task. Matched trajectories suggest why fit varies. Models start almost all repairs themselves, so much depends on whether the harness hands failures back in a form the model can use. GPT does best with PI's lean scaffold, while Kimi, which often issues malformed tool calls, does best in openJiuwen. We argue that the model, the harness, and the task should be evaluated together, and we release the harness adapters, evaluation code, and all 6,204 scored trajectories at https://github.com/liyix/finding-the-right-fit and https://huggingface.co/datasets/yixuanli97/finding-the-right-fit.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Correctness, Convergence, and AI-Generated Code Detection: A Longitudinal Study of Student and Large Language Model Code in Introductory Programming
WebUIProof: Benchmarking WebUI Code Generators with UI-Agent Execution Harness
FORALL-LEAN-AGENT for Auditable Reasoning in Formal Mathematics and Software Verification
Self-Supervised Scaling of Terminal Environments for Scientific Domains
Cross-Benchmark Transfer from RL on Agentic Coding Tasks
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.