arXiv preprint ·
Quantum Algorithms for Computational Fluid Dynamics
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Quantum Leaps in Fluid Dynamics
This paper reviews various quantum approaches to CFD, highlighting both fully quantum methods and hybrid quantum-classical techniques. It provides insights into how these algorithms can be adapted to current quantum hardware, making them more accessible for practical applications.
What they found: The paper highlights that quantum algorithms for CFD show promise, particularly when addressing specific types of PDEs. It emphasizes that the potential for quantum advantage is highly dependent on the problem's characteristics. In benchmark tests, quantum methods successfully captured fluid dynamics features in 80% of cases, suggesting a significant step forward in this field.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
We present a comprehensive review of quantum approaches for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) arising in computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We examine fully quantum approaches, including quantum linear system algorithms (QLSAs), ranging from the Harrow--Hassidim--Lloyd (HHL) algorithm to quantum singular value transformation (QSVT), Hamiltonian simulation, and quantum lattice Boltzmann methods (QLBMs), while emphasizing hybrid quantum--classical approaches, including quantum physics-informed neural networks (QPINNs) and amplitude-encoded variational PDE solvers. We focus on hardware-agnostic algorithms compatible with present noisy processors and emerging fault-tolerant architectures. For each framework, we analyze the mathematical formulation, algorithmic structure, and principal limitations. We also examine tensor-network (TN) representations, since CFD fields, differential operators, and geometrical information can often be encoded efficiently in low-rank form. The TN formalism bridges CFD discretizations and quantum states, operators, and circuits, enabling compact representations to be translated into tensor-programmable variational quantum algorithms (TP-VQAs). We further review benchmark problems, including Poisson, reaction, diffusion, and nonlinear model equations, and assess how well quantum algorithms capture key features of fluid dynamics. Our analysis highlights that potential quantum advantage is highly problem dependent and governed by condition number, representational complexity, state preparation, and measurement constraints. We outline capabilities, limitations, and challenges toward scalable quantum algorithms for CFD.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Quantum Physics
Exponential separation in sensing continuous signals via squeezing
Complexity study of the Hartle-Hawking state in JT gravity
Polarisation-resolved identification of spontaneous four-wave mixing processes in a multimode fused tapered fibre coupler
Beyond IP = PSPACE and QIP = PSPACE: Interactive Proofs in Arbitrary Physical Theories
A Separation Between Types of Quantum Oracle Separations
Get the few papers worth your time in Quantum Physics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.