arXiv preprint ·
Learning When and How to Intervene: A Hindsight-Distilled Sentinel for Coding Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2609.39957
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Coding agents solve repository-level tasks through sequences of actions, where a single erroneous action can misdirect subsequent decisions and increase recovery costs. Existing approaches use execution feedback for recovery or specialized checks to block errors, but deciding before execution whether intervention will benefit eventual task completion remains challenging. To address this challenge, we propose HiSentinel, a hindsight-distillation framework that trains lightweight 0.6B and 1.7B sentinels to select pre-execution interventions aimed at improving task completion rather than correcting every imperfect action. A privileged teacher uses recorded execution outcomes as evidence for intervention judgments, which are distilled into a causal student that receives only the pre-action context and proposed action. Beyond identifying whether and when to intervene, the sentinel must also provide actionable feedback that helps the coding agent recover or obtain necessary human input. To support these capabilities, we introduce SWE-Intervene, an action-level dataset constructed from software-engineering trajectories that annotates whether an action should be allowed, autonomously redirected, or paused for human assistance, together with corresponding intervention feedback. Across SWE-bench Verified Mini and Ask or Assume, HiSentinel consistently improves task completion across Sentinel scales and coding-agent families, with gains of up to 14% and 10%, respectively, while maintaining competitive token consumption. These results demonstrate that lightweight pre-execution intervention can effectively prevent error propagation and improve the reliability of autonomous coding agents.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Adaptive-GEPA: Make Your Harness Fit Heterogeneous Requests
Correctness, Convergence, and AI-Generated Code Detection: A Longitudinal Study of Student and Large Language Model Code in Introductory Programming
PatchHolmes: Agentic Patch Retrieval via Listwise Selection
FORALL-LEAN-AGENT for Auditable Reasoning in Formal Mathematics and Software Verification
Toward Quantum Software Automation: A Quantum-Aware Harness for LLM-Guided Evolution
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.