arXiv preprint ·
The Concrete-Arbitrary Gap: Kinship Reasoning in LLMs Is Not Indifferent to Presentation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We test whether large language models solve formally matched kinship problems equally well when relations are expressed in familiar vocabulary or by explicitly defined nonce predicates. Across 500 paired graphs, concrete accuracy exceeds arbitrary accuracy by 35.6 percentage points in local Qwen3.8-27B, 26.6 in Gemma 4 26B-A4B, 12.0 in Gemma 4 31B, and 5.4 in Qwen3.8-Max. All four paired gaps are statistically resolved. Reasoning budgets and prompt-language interventions can substantially reduce the difference, showing that it is modifiable rather than a fixed incapacity. The minimal conclusion is behavioral: on these tasks, the models' manifested relational competence is not indifferent to presentation. Explicit definitions provide the formal relations but do not make nonce predicates as usable as familiar vocabulary embedded in learned linguistic associations.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
MetaSteer: Context-Conditioned, nonlinear Steering via Attention-Projection Adaptation
AuraForge: Scaling Security Supervision for Training Coding Agents
Anchor-ECC: Local Integrity Checking for Watermarked LLM Outputs via Error-Correcting Codes
Child-Adapted Structured Phonological Representations for Interpretable Speech Sound Analysis
Training LLM Judges from Language Feedback via Position-Selective Self-Distillation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.