arXiv preprint ·
FIGS: Evaluating Multi-Turn Sycophancy Without Penalizing Empathy
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models frequently fail to balance staying truthful with being supportive. They often exhibit sycophancy in responses to users, agreeing with false claims, offering unwarranted flattery, and giving advice skewed toward users' expressed views. In reality, sycophancy rarely happens in a single exchange; it may emerge organically as users repeatedly insist or subtly steer the dialogue over time. Current evaluations, however, rely on rigid, single-turn tests or fixed scripts that fail to capture these natural dynamics. Furthermore, these benchmarks often mistake showing basic empathy for yielding, penalizing models for acknowledging a user's feeling. This view may drive future models to over-correct into cold, dismissive rigidity. To address this gap, we introduce FIGS (Factual Integrity and Grounded Support), a dual-axis evaluation framework built around extended, realistic dialogue. We use an adaptive 10-turn conversational simulator that dynamically challenges the target model, reflecting how users repeat requests, push back, or steer a conversation toward a preferred answer. To accurately evaluate these trajectories, we apply a taxonomy that strictly separates Sycophancy (whether the model holds firm to the truth and keeps its praise proportional) from Calibrated Validation (showing empathetic understanding of the user's feelings without overdoing it). We release our complete testing environment, including 500 diverse multi-turn scenarios and an automated judge. Our evaluation of leading models reveals a consistent trade-off: over the course of a sustained interaction, current systems either slowly drift to sycophancy or over-correct into robotic detachment. This demonstrates that balancing honesty with appropriate support throughout a natural conversation remains a critical, unsolved challenge.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
MetaSteer: Context-Conditioned, nonlinear Steering via Attention-Projection Adaptation
AuraForge: Scaling Security Supervision for Training Coding Agents
Anchor-ECC: Local Integrity Checking for Watermarked LLM Outputs via Error-Correcting Codes
Child-Adapted Structured Phonological Representations for Interpretable Speech Sound Analysis
Training LLM Judges from Language Feedback via Position-Selective Self-Distillation
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.