arXiv preprint ·
What makes a causal loop consistent?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Causal loops escape paradoxes if they generate valid probabilities under arbitrary independent local interventions. We show that a deterministic classical process is logically consistent if and only if it contains no signaling loops: cyclic signaling is forbidden but cyclic causation is not, allowing indefinite causal order. Logical consistency is then found to hold exactly when the list of events of a process is pairwise exclusive and complete, providing the first event-based, intervention-free, non-recursive characterization of consistent causal loops. Our results repair a previously introduced intervention-free criterion that misses global loops and reveal that what makes deterministic classical communications without causal order consistent is a multipartite form of Specker's principle: if any two of several questions can be answered jointly, so can all of them.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Quantum Physics
Exponential separation in sensing continuous signals via squeezing
Complexity study of the Hartle-Hawking state in JT gravity
Polarisation-resolved identification of spontaneous four-wave mixing processes in a multimode fused tapered fibre coupler
Beyond IP = PSPACE and QIP = PSPACE: Interactive Proofs in Arbitrary Physical Theories
A Separation Between Types of Quantum Oracle Separations
Get the few papers worth your time in Quantum Physics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.