arXiv preprint ·

Correcting CondOT: Exact Finite-Step Sampling in Gaussian Flow Matching

Ron Levy and Michael Elad

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine Learning

Abstract

Flow matching generates samples by gradually transforming noise into data. In practice, using a finite number of sampling steps introduces a numerical error that depends on the chosen schedule. We study this dependence for Gaussian targets and the explicit midpoint sampling method, using the exact flow field. We measure sampling error by the squared Wasserstein distance between the target distribution and the final distribution produced by the midpoint sampler. We show that the standard conditional optimal transport (CondOT) schedule cancels the leading midpoint error and improves the general convergence bound, even when the sampling steps are unequally spaced. On a uniform grid of $S$ sampling steps, we fix the signal schedule at $α_t=t$ and prove the existence of scalar noise schedules $β_t$ that approach the CondOT noise schedule $1-t$ at rate $1/S$ and yield exact Gaussian sampling for every sufficiently large $S$. Controlled Gaussian experiments illustrate the convergence rates and exact calibration.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics