arXiv preprint ·
Also Small Models Can Reasonably Self-Evaluate Their Confidence
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
This study systematically evaluates self-evaluation-based uncertainty quantification across different language models of varying sizes on question-answering tasks spanning general to specialized knowledge domains. Using various self-evaluation methods where models judge their own predictions, we examine how model scale and domain specificity affect the quality of self-assessed confidence signals. Our results reveal that while accuracy predictably declines with smaller models and more specialized domains, the reliability of self-evaluated confidence remains largely stable across both dimensions. This independence means the most capable model is not necessarily the best at self-assessing prediction reliability. These findings suggest that smaller models can achieve reasonable self-assessed confidence despite lower accuracy, making them viable for resource-constrained deployments.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
ReGain: Restoring Subject Fidelity in Personalization on Synthetic Images
SmoothOperator: Enhancing Representations for Fine-grained Open-set Recognition via Modulated Label Smoothing
Code to Control: Synthesizing Parameterized Reactive Controllers
Fixing a Model That Learned Worse Cancer Means Lower Risk: Monotonic Constraints in Bladder Cancer Recurrence Prediction
Molecular Property Prediction under Structural Shift with Tabular Foundation Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.