arXiv preprint ·
Structure vs. Chain-of-Thought: Evaluating LLM Criteria Extraction for Depression Severity
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A large language model (LLM) can rate depression severity directly from a social media post or mark which clinical criteria the post shows and let code turn the count into a label. The latter is easier to audit because a clinician can check each marked criterion. We compare these approaches on two Reddit corpora using three LLMs (from 9B to frontier scale) and two questionnaires (PHQ-9, BDI-II), and measure agreement with quadratic weighted kappa. For the two frontier models, criteria extraction scores above chain-of-thought on one corpus only when its decision thresholds are fitted on labeled data. Neither model's gain is significant, with or without recalibrating chain-of-thought on the same labels. With thresholds fixed a priori from PHQ-9's criteria, extraction shows no gain on either corpus, even where models mark over two criteria per post. The 9B model behaves differently on a corpus from depression communities. It labels most posts severe, whether prompted directly or with chain-of-thought, while the a priori rule beats both without labels. After chain-of-thought is recalibrated on the same labels, no significant gap remains, consistent with a calibration effect. Yet higher ordinal agreement does not ensure better detection of severe cases. PHQ-9 criteria extraction misses most severe posts, and moving from direct prompting to chain-of-thought and then to extraction increases misses in nearly all comparisons. On the primary corpus, a relabeled stress dataset, a model using that dataset's own features, including word counts from the text, is not significantly different from frontier criteria extraction under the a priori rule.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
MetaSteer: Context-Conditioned, nonlinear Steering via Attention-Projection Adaptation
AuraForge: Scaling Security Supervision for Training Coding Agents
Anchor-ECC: Local Integrity Checking for Watermarked LLM Outputs via Error-Correcting Codes
Child-Adapted Structured Phonological Representations for Interpretable Speech Sound Analysis
Training LLM Judges from Language Feedback via Position-Selective Self-Distillation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.