arXiv preprint ·
Refusals That Bend: Measuring and Predicting Task Malleability in Embodied VLM Planners
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Embodied vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed as high-level planners for robots because they generalize across diverse environments. However, this requires their safety alignment to also hold in unseen environments. Existing red-teaming assumes an adversary who optimizes the prompt, the pixels, or text in the environment, and existing benchmarks ask whether a planner recognizes or mitigates a hazard in a fixed scene. Neither asks whether a refusal the planner has already given survives an ordinary change to the environment. We ask that question by placing a single everyday object into the environment, with no pixel, gradient, or prompt under adversarial control. On $846$ tasks that a constitution-guarded planner initially refuses, we find $20.2\%$ of tasks can be flipped to compliance by one or more objects, and the number of objects differs from one task to another. In addition, the object need not be chosen for the task, i.e., items drawn from a fixed list, with no knowledge of the environment or the instruction, bypass safety about as often as items proposed for the specific task. We qualitatively contrast the tasks bypassed most and least often and find that the distinction lies in how conspicuous the hazard is in the instruction and environment. Susceptibility to safety bypass is therefore a property of the task, which we call its \emph{malleability}, and we show that it can be predicted before the target is ever queried. A composite of signals read from a small open-source VLM identifies malleable tasks $2.4\times$ as often as picking at random. Everyday objects, whether placed by an adversary or introduced by ordinary rearrangement of the environment, are thus sufficient to overturn a refusal. Because susceptibility is determined by how a task is specified, we recommend assessing malleability per task prior to deployment.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Does the Readout Bypass Leak the Input? A Feature-Visibility Audit of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Models
AuraForge: Scaling Security Supervision for Training Coding Agents
Anchor-ECC: Local Integrity Checking for Watermarked LLM Outputs via Error-Correcting Codes
DeBERTa-ConPara: Attack-Aware and Deployment-Realistic Detection of AI-Generated Text
SparLeak: Privacy Leakage from Sparse Attention in LLM Inference on Shared GPUs
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.