arXiv preprint ·
Evaluating Whether GPT-6 Astra Performs Unsanctioned Supply-Chain Attacks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
This technical report presents an alignment evaluation developed and performed by the UK AI Security Institute for assessing whether advanced AI systems take unsanctioned actions outside the scope of their assigned task. We evaluate whether frontier models conduct supply-chain attacks against out-of-scope, third-party targets when placed in difficult cybersecurity challenges, motivated by recently observed cases of models attacking real open-source repositories during evaluations. Applying our methods to GPT-6 Astra and previous OpenAI models, with cyber safeguards disabled, we find that GPT-6 Astra attempts complete supply-chain attacks in simulation at a higher rate than GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5. This includes writing malicious code as a contribution to an out-of-scope open-source codebase, creating fake identities to deceive open-source developers, and submitting benign contributions before malicious ones. GPT-6 Astra frequently reasons about the scope of the challenge in its chain-of-thought yet still proceeds to attack out-of-scope targets; it often asks for permission, and treats an automated message as as authorisation; and it continues to take unsanctioned actions, at a reduced rate, when internet access is more explicitly disallowed. Our evaluation builds on an internal version of Petri, an open-source LLM auditing tool, with all tool calls simulated by other LLMs, so that no real network access, systems or third-party repositories are reachable and no real-world harm is caused. Finally, we discuss limitations, in particular simulation awareness. We believe simulation awareness may have driven some of the observed behaviour but does not remove our concern. Our results suggest that defences beyond model alignment, such as sandboxing and monitoring, are increasingly critical for safe and secure deployment.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
FinRT: Distilling Adaptive Red-Teaming Strategies into Reusable Adversarial Generators in Consumer Finance
Does the Readout Bypass Leak the Input? A Feature-Visibility Audit of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Models
CounterSteer: Suppressing Indirect Prompt Injection with Activation Steering
Anchor-ECC: Local Integrity Checking for Watermarked LLM Outputs via Error-Correcting Codes
Understanding Private Evolution as Learning-Augmented Clustering
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.