arXiv preprint ·
On Task Scope and Information Retention in Source Coding
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We argue that dividing codec design into Coding for Machines (CfM) and Coding for Humans (CfH) is a misleading distinction for deciding what information a codec may discard. Receiver identity does not determine admissible information loss. The required rate depends on task scope, including the predictions to support, their losses and tolerated risks, the encoder observation, and the permitted decoding procedures. Notably, a machine task may have a higher minimum rate than a restricted human decision. Rate savings on selected machine tasks apply only to the stated requirements, not to an intrinsic ordering by receiver type. We extend source and feature coding to finite task families, derive when restricting the encoder observation preserves the minimum rate, and show that equality between source and split-feature coding rates can no longer hold as the task scope expands.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Theory
Reliability Testing of Medical Model Performance under Distributed Deployment
ReGain: Restoring Subject Fidelity in Personalization on Synthetic Images
Salt++: Context-Aligned Post-Training for Few-Step Streaming Multimodal Generation
ExpandDiff: Dynamic Range Expanding Diffusion for Single-Image HDR Reconstruction
Tissue Detection Determines False Positives in Diffusion-Based Histopathology Artifact Detection
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Theory every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.