arXiv preprint ·
Why Adaptive Optimizers Underestimate Rare Tokens
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In the softmax output layer, a rare token receives a small positive logit gradient on most steps and a much larger negative gradient on the few steps when it is the target. SGD simply adds these contributions. Coordinate-wise adaptive methods such as Adam, RMSProp, and sign descent instead divide each update by a running estimate of its magnitude, and that estimate is largest immediately after the token appears. This imbalance has two effects. At the level of the whole output layer, we characterize which optimizers preserve the mean output embedding: every method whose update is linear in past gradients does, as do Kronecker-factored and orthogonalized methods such as Shampoo and Muon. Adam, Adafactor, Lion, and sign descent do not, and for these methods we obtain an exact step-by-step expression for the change. At the level of an individual rare token, the same normalization shifts the training fixed point. In the unigram model, sign descent lowers the logit of every token that occurs in fewer than half of the minibatches at a constant expected rate. For RMSProp with periodic arrivals, we can solve the fixed point in closed form: if a token is absent for at least two consecutive minibatches, its equilibrium probability is strictly below its data frequency for every learning rate, and the ratio tends to $κ/(2(e^{κ/2}-1))$. Here $κ$ is the mean number of steps between occurrences divided by the second-moment time constant $1/(1-β_2)$. In the same model, SGD and AMSGrad retain the unbiased fixed point. We test these predictions both in a unigram model and in a small language model trained from a known generating distribution. With random arrivals, the bias is larger than the periodic formula predicts; in the language model, the optimizers with the biased fixed point also fit the generating distribution less well.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Optimal Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning
Optimal VC Dimension of Contrastive Learning with Margin
Hierarchical Utility Calibration for Structured Multiclass Decisions
Optimal Allocation and Volume under Surface
Optimal detection of general moment changes: Simultaneous mean and covariance change detection and beyond
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.