arXiv preprint ·
Exploring Emotional Intelligence in Software Testing
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Emotional Intelligence (EI) is the ability to recognise, understand, and manage one's own and others' emotions. Software testers deliver judgements about colleagues' work under deadlines they do not control, and prior work on emotion in software engineering has mostly studied developers. Aims: To explore how software testers describe the part EI plays in their day-to-day work, in communication and conflict within the team, and in responding to requirements volatility. Method: Semi-structured interviews with 16 software testers in Sweden working in teams that use agile practices, across aviation, automotive, healthcare, IT services, administration, banking and pharmaceuticals, analysed with reflexive thematic analysis informed by Goleman's EI framework. Results: Three themes. Testers described regulating stress under deadline pressure and drawing motivation from recognition, clarity and autonomy; managing the daily delivery of critical findings to colleagues so that trust survives; and responding to requirements change with frustration that turned into decisions about what to leave untested, into advocacy for process change, or into workarounds. Read against developer-focused studies, the themes point to features of the testing role: the work product is a criticism of a colleague's work, success is invisible while failure is attributed, and the tester's window shrinks with every upstream delay. Conclusions: For testers, managing emotions is a constant job requirement. The results highlight that the importance of EI increases when the development process lacks an independent testing phase. The findings also inform implications for teams and, ultimately, for organisations and future research.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
WitnessGym: Benchmarking Coding Agents on the Construction of Bug Witnesses
Adaptive-GEPA: Make Your Harness Fit Heterogeneous Requests
CTE-Bench: Counterfactual Trace Evaluation for Stateful Software Simulators
PatchHolmes: Agentic Patch Retrieval via Listwise Selection
Can Agents Design Libraries for Agents?
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.