arXiv preprint ·
Do-JEPA: From Masking to Intervention in Latent World Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Latent world models are trained to predict what happens next, so nothing in their objective separates what an action caused from what merely co-occurred with it. Object-masking models such as C-JEPA intervene on what the predictor can see; we intervene on what physically happens. From one saved simulator state we run the dynamics under an action $a$ and under a reference action $a_{\varnothing}$, and train the model to predict the difference $Δz=z^{a}-z^{a_{\varnothing}}$ between the two latent futures. The resulting objective, Do-JEPA, has an effect loss, a support loss (where the action enters), a propagation loss (where its effect travels) and invariance losses (what must not change). In a synthetic system with object-aligned variables, support supervision finds the directly intervened object in 99.95% of test cases, where a sparse action mask sends the action to a nuisance slot in every case, and response-onset supervision recovers the ring-shaped propagation graph (edge AUROC 0.975 vs. 0.624). From pixels, the effect loss beats a control trained on exactly the same data: it lowers latent effect error by 28.4% on an end-to-end LeWM model and physical effect error by 13.5% when trained and tested on natural action sequences, and on three independently generated CausalWorld benchmarks it lowers responsive effect error by about 20% under physics shifts and the latent context sensitivity of predicted effects by 66%. Trained from scratch it costs factual accuracy; fine-tuning an existing model with it removes this cost. Together, these results show that intervening on the world, rather than on what the model sees, helps latent world models predict what their actions cause.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
What Makes High-Magnification Knowledge Transferable? A Study of Cross-Resolution Distillation in Whole-Slide Imaging
ReGain: Restoring Subject Fidelity in Personalization on Synthetic Images
FineART: Fine-Grained Annotated Robotic Trajectory Dataset and Vision-Language-Action Model for Bimanual Manipulation
Unveiling the Value of Motion for Cinematic Camera Trajectories
Losing the name before the box: measuring and repairing what narrow fine-tuning costs a detector outside its deployment vocabulary
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.