arXiv preprint ·
LoLBench: Evaluating Coding Agents with Long-Horizon Proposals on Large Software Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Modern coding agents can deliver increasingly large repository-level changes, and recent benchmarks reflect this by emphasizing long-horizon tasks with large reference implementations. Many benchmarks evaluate coding agents' implementation capability to produce correct code edits from detailed specifications. However, practical modular development tasks also require the perception capability of grounding user intent and high-level design to derive a specification. We introduce LoLBench to evaluate both capabilities through the entire proposal-to-implementation process on large software systems. It is a multilingual benchmark of 100 tasks across 29 software systems in five domains. Each task provides a human-written enhancement proposal with user intent and high-level design. On average, proposals contain about 5,000 words, software systems contain 2.4 million source lines of code (LoC), and implementation pull requests (PRs) change approximately 5,500 LoC. Across 28 agents we evaluated, the best agent resolves only 14% of tasks and achieves a 52.7% Fail-to-Pass (F2P) pass rate. Failure analysis identifies incomplete code localization as a major bottleneck, while providing reference-derived file trees alongside API specifications improves resolved rates by 16--22 percentage points (2.4--17$\times$), reaching at most 34%. These results show that both perception and implementation remain central challenges for coding agents in practical modular development on large software systems. LoLBench is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/lolbench26/LoLBench.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
WitnessGym: Benchmarking Coding Agents on the Construction of Bug Witnesses
Adaptive-GEPA: Make Your Harness Fit Heterogeneous Requests
CTE-Bench: Counterfactual Trace Evaluation for Stateful Software Simulators
PatchHolmes: Agentic Patch Retrieval via Listwise Selection
Can Agents Design Libraries for Agents?
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.