arXiv preprint ·
Repetition, Not Length: Isolating the Counting Failure in Neural Text-to-Speech
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Text-to-speech models loop, truncate and lose count on text that repeats a phrase many times. We show that repetition itself is what breaks them, not the length that comes with it. Every repeated sentence in our test set is paired with a control of matched sentence and word count in which no word ever repeats back-to-back. Six models from three architectures render the controls almost perfectly and fail the repeated twins: 94.3% against 18.2% exactly right at k >= 6. The gap survives greedy decoding, repetition-penalty sweeps, four independent speech recognisers and 420 analysis specifications without once reversing sign; a held-out fourth architecture lands within a point of its predicted gap, and one of two non-autoregressive baselines shows the same failure. Varying the period of the text shows the failure grows smoothly with periodicity, half of it surviving when no word is adjacent to itself.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Emergent Tonal Structure in Learned Chord Embeddings and Its Relation to Tonal Tension
RAST: Resolution-Aware Privileged Structure Transfer for Low-Resolution Audio Activity Recognition
InterBias-SV: Compound Conditions in Speaker Verification
A barrier or a booster? Familiarity effects on Mandarin emotion prosody recognition using AI-powered voice cloning
Long-Term Memory-Guided Enhancement for Target Perception in Audio-Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.