arXiv preprint ·
Does the VGGT Family Need All Its Layers?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Which layers of a feed-forward geometry model are needed to preserve both camera poses and dense 3D structure? We study layer redundancy in VGGT, $π^3$, and VGGT-$Ω$: 3,018 pruned configurations, scored on seven camera-pose and dense-geometry metrics across four indoor and outdoor datasets. Four findings follow: (i) Removable layers cluster in two redundancy regions: a dominant early region and a narrower late one, while deletions spanning the intervening layers are consistently more disruptive. This recurring pattern holds across models, datasets, and metrics, and contrasts with the middle-to-late redundancy commonly reported in the literature. (ii) Within these regions, we observe that the joint degradation from deleting two intervals is approximately the sum of their individual degradations, reducing the number of model evaluations for pruning search from $O(L^4)$ to $O(L^2)$, where $L$ is the aggregator depth. (iii) We find that CKA provides a cheaper representation-based proxy for interval degradation, offering a practical trade-off between pruning quality and calibration cost. (iv) Closed-form linear calibration recovers accuracy after pruning without end-to-end retraining. A least-squares analysis shows that using a shared map for special and patch tokens generally incurs excess reconstruction loss, motivating token-aware recovery. Recovery maps fitted on just 100 calibration scenes generalize to held-out scenes and unseen datasets. The resulting models reduce aggregator parameters by up to 44% while maintaining accuracy comparable to their intact counterparts. Code and experimental results will be available at our project page: https://xian-bei.github.io/vggt-family-layer-redundancy/
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
What Makes High-Magnification Knowledge Transferable? A Study of Cross-Resolution Distillation in Whole-Slide Imaging
ReGain: Restoring Subject Fidelity in Personalization on Synthetic Images
FineART: Fine-Grained Annotated Robotic Trajectory Dataset and Vision-Language-Action Model for Bimanual Manipulation
Unveiling the Value of Motion for Cinematic Camera Trajectories
Losing the name before the box: measuring and repairing what narrow fine-tuning costs a detector outside its deployment vocabulary
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.