arXiv preprint ·
Generating Edit-Inducing Questions for AI Research Manuscripts
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We study the ability of LLMs to generate edit-inducing questions whose answer will improve a paper draft. On a dataset of paired submission and camera-ready papers from ICLR and NeurIPS, we compare the helpfulness of questions from GPT models with or without full paper context to that of human reviewers. GPT produces more edit-inducing questions and its questions are associated with more extensive edits and cover a broader range of edited content compared to questions from reviewers. However, a much smaller percentage of the GPT questions are edit-inducing. Our analyses confirm that automated questions can be beneficial to authors and highlight an example task where proper attending to long context deteriorates reasoning model ability to produce helpful output.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: Systematically Erasing LLM's Memories
MetaSteer: Context-Conditioned, nonlinear Steering via Attention-Projection Adaptation
MemFold: Learning Compact Soft Memory for Long-Context Personalization via On-Policy Optimization
Anchor-ECC: Local Integrity Checking for Watermarked LLM Outputs via Error-Correcting Codes
Invariant Atoms: Sparse Coordinates of Local Semantic Geometry in Language Model Representations
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.