arXiv preprint ·
Selective Elicitation as a Commercial Influence Channel: A Reproducible Synthetic Shopping-Agent Stress Test
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A commercial incentive need not enter the final ranking algorithm to affect a shopping assistant's recommendation: it may instead influence which preference question the assistant asks. We make this distinction experimentally observable in a deliberately small, synthetic setting. Each task has two products, three verified numerical attributes, a price limit, and a private fixed preference vector. An honest simulated user answers one pairwise question. A separate recommender receives the products and this answer but not the sponsorship assignment. We contrast a neutral question, a soft commercial instruction, and an explicitly adversarial instruction to ask about the sponsor's advantage while omitting the rival's advantage. Across 40 held-out sponsorship-assignment cases (20 distinct catalog-preference contexts), the soft instruction changes no selections. The targeted instruction raises sponsored selection by 0.30 and reduces mean synthetic utility by 0.0547 relative to neutral questioning (95% context-bootstrap interval [-0.0828, -0.0291]) for one language-model recommender. A fixed Bayesian recommender shows a similar effect; a second model makes the same choices on all 120 frozen question-answer inputs. A terminal-answer consistency judge rates all 20 sampled targeted answers consistent, although five have synthetic regret above 0.05; a separate question-coverage dimension flags their one-sided elicitation. A robust partial-preference certificate remains valid under the stipulated synthetic utility but certifies only 16 of 40 targeted cases and is not better than asking a neutral question directly. These results establish neither typical behavior under advertising incentives nor effects on actual consumers.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Travel Mode- and Purpose-Specific Origin-Destination Matrices for England and Wales from Fused Travel Survey and Mobile Network Data
Whose Voice Survives the Summary? A Voice-Retention Audit of LLM Employee Listening
Retrieval Sensitivity to Identity Signals in Queries
Characterizing Questioning Patterns and Student Engagement Through Contextual Analysis of Real-Time Classroom Interactions
Breaking News Out of the Filter Bubble: Generative AI Search Diversifies Collective Attention and Raises Shared Information Consumption
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.