arXiv preprint ·
A tale of two allocations: Risk capital contributions versus risk contributions in the tail
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We compare two natural proportional notions of a risk component's contribution to the aggregate tail risk of a collection of risks: the fraction of aggregate tail risk capital allocated to the component under Conditional Tail Expectation (CTE), and the component's expected realized share of aggregate risk under Geometric Tail Expectation (GTE). The resulting proportional allocations generally differ. For arbitrary random vectors-allowing atoms, signed risks, and any tail domain--we establish when the allocations agree, determine their ordering when they do not, and characterize their asymptotic separation. Both proportional allocations are weighted averages of the conditional risk share of a component given the aggregate: the proportional CTE allocation weights tail scenarios by severity, whereas the proportional GTE allocation weights them uniformly. Their difference is therefore a normalized tail covariance. The proportional CTE and GTE allocations agree throughout a tail exactly when the conditional risk share is constant there; under a mild unimodality condition, dominance is characterized by its monotonicity. Among independent exponential dispersion models with heterogeneous natural parameters, exact agreement is possible only for the scaled Poisson family; under comonotonicity, it is equivalent to proportional quantile functions. In the extreme tail, the limiting relationship between the proportional CTE and GTE allocations is governed by the ratio of Expected Shortfall to Value-at-Risk: boundedness ensures common limits, convergence to one forces the allocations to merge, and divergence can cause their limits to separate.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Risk Management
Deep kernel hedging
Multiperiod bond portfolio optimization with transaction costs using a Markov Decision process
Optimal Catastrophe Bond Design and its Applications to Climate Change Risk
Exact Trade-Level Attribution of FRTB-IMA Capital
Landscape-Dependent Performance of Photonic Quantum Solvers in QUBO Feature Selection for Financial Risk Detection
Get the few papers worth your time in Risk Management every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.