arXiv preprint ·
Reconstructing Implicit Scientific Knowledge: Evaluating LLM Agents through End-to-End Reproduction of Astronomy
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The integration of large language models (LLMs) into scientific workflows is accelerating, yet their ability to reconstruct the reasoning underlying published research remains unexplored. Papers specify explicit procedures while leaving many methodological dependencies-data selection, calibration corrections, priors, and domain assumptions-implicit. This ambiguity complicates the evaluation of LLM-based agents, since a failure to reproduce a result may reflect either limitations of the agent or underspecification in the source. We present a framework that evaluates agents through end-to-end reproduction, separating execution from verification and computational failure from methodological ambiguity. We apply it to fourteen astronomy studies: a case study from The Astrophysical Journal and thirteen papers published in Nature. Eleven of the thirteen contained an ambiguity preventing a uniquely specified reproduction path. In a controlled case study, twelve predefined paths, a 3x2x2 sensitivity analysis over sample definition, sky masking, and parallax zero-point treatment-gave estimates from 2.16 to 3.53 kpc for the same quantity, with only one recovering the published value (about 2.70 kpc). The published value was never used as an optimization target, selection criterion, or stopping condition; the matching path was found only after all twelve had run. Crucially, the decisive information (a +0.02 mas parallax zero-point correction) was already in the paper, but the agents did not recognize its causal relevance until the analysis made the effect visible. Matching a published outcome therefore does not validate reconstruction of the underlying reasoning, and the bottleneck is as often a failure to connect relevant information as to retrieve it. End-to-end reproduction thus serves both as a test of reproducibility and as a framework for evaluating implicit scientific knowledge in AI systems.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Instrumentation & Methods for Astrophysics
Improving Lens Modelling from Ground-Based Imaging with Deconvolution
Everything Everywhere All At Once: A Hierarchical Framework for Mapping Anisotropies in the Local Universe
MATISSE in the era of GRAVITY+
A Bayesian Inference Framework for Binary Lens Events Fully Incorporating Higher-Order Effects
The 2MIG isolated AGNs -- 4. Linking hot-dust reverberation to spectroscopically predicted BLR scales in IC~5287 and Mrk~845
All new papers in Instrumentation & Methods for Astrophysics
Get the few papers worth your time in Instrumentation & Methods for Astrophysics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.