arXiv preprint ·
Collective Regimes in Multi-Agent LLMs under Reasoning Effort and Communication Topology
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Multi-agent LLM systems are increasingly used for deliberation and evaluation, often under the assumption that greater peer interaction leads to more reliable consensus. Existing work largely evaluates these systems through final accuracy or aggregate agreement. However, such measures do not reveal how agreement is organized in the panel. In this paper, we study \(N=50\) stateless LLM agents that update their predictions from locally visible peers, and characterize their behavior using both global and local measurements of agreement. We identify three collective regimes: synchronised, twisted (locally ordered but globally incoherent) and chimera-like, where coherent and incoherent subpopulations coexist. Increasing reasoning effort in gpt-5-mini shifts panels from variable, often fragmented outcomes toward locally ordered twisted states, and a small follow-up shows such states can also form from permuted initial conditions, whereas increasing communication connectivity drives them toward global synchronisation. Fragmentation collapses faster as algebraic connectivity increases across rewired graphs. The topology effect also appears on a non-circular judging task and across models from three providers. Finally, low spatial heterogeneity does not guarantee global consensus: 40\% of trials with $ΔZ$ below 0.03 retain a twisted configuration through the final 20 turns. These results show that reasoning effort and communication topology control different aspects of multi-agent coordination, and that aggregate agreement alone is insufficient to characterize collective LLM behavior.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Multiagent Systems
ORBIT: A Framework for Multi-Agent Safety and Security Evaluations
ReplayLens: Auditing Agents' Use of Outcomes
ParallelPilot: Supporting Coordination and Monitoring in Parallel AI Coding
Same Winners, Different Success Rates: Evaluating How LLM Agents Recover from Failures
Modular Discovery of General Game-Playing Algorithms with Large Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Multiagent Systems every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.