arXiv preprint ·
Distillation Defenses Easily Break After Reinforcement Learning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Distillation attacks copy the reasoning capabilities of closed-source large language models, allowing bad actors to replicate state-of-the-art performance at low cost. Attackers systematically collect a large volume of frontier model reasoning traces and then train (i.e., "distill") their own models on these traces. Existing defenses against distillation attacks are typically evaluated immediately after distillation, implicitly assuming attackers do not train their models any further. In this paper, we argue that a more realistic threat model includes further training with reinforcement learning after distillation. A misspecified threat model can give a false sense of security -- some defenses that seem effective after distillation can be broken after subsequent reinforcement learning. Practically, reinforcement learning lowers the bar for a distillation attack to be effective. We show that simple attacks can steal reasoning capabilities from existing closed-source language models using data easily obtainable from current APIs, yielding reasoning improvements equivalent to more sophisticated attacks that extract the full hidden traces. Results indicate that any distillation defense that leaks sufficient information to reconstruct approximate reasoning traces is likely ineffective. We conclude by discussing broader implications and batch-level distillation defenses which could be more effective.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Faultless: A Program Equivalence Technique for Validating and Evaluating Neural Decompilers
FinRT: Distilling Adaptive Red-Teaming Strategies into Reusable Adversarial Generators in Consumer Finance
Certified Multi-Source Integrity for Structured Agent Actions
CounterSteer: Suppressing Indirect Prompt Injection with Activation Steering
Before Agents Act: Assurance-Aware Semantic Scheduling for Evidence Acquisition in Distributed Systems
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.