arXiv preprint ·
AI-based matching improves refugee employment in a double-blind randomized trial
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Refugee integration is a central policy challenge for host countries, and where governments initially place refugees shapes their integration trajectories. Yet placement officers often have limited information about where each case is most likely to succeed. Algorithmic refugee matching uses administrative data, machine learning, and constrained optimization to recommend employment-optimized placements in real time as cases arrive, with human placement officers retaining final authority. Between January 2020 and June 2023, the Swiss State Secretariat for Migration randomly assigned about 2,000 refugee cases to receive a canton recommendation either algorithmically optimized for employment or drawn to approximate existing procedures, with placement officers and refugees blinded to assignment. The two arms used identical but separate canton and origin-group quotas, so gains reflect better refugee-canton matching rather than reallocation toward stronger labor markets. The trial began just before the COVID-19 pandemic shifted labor-market conditions. For the pre-registered primary outcome -- the share of months employed during the first three years -- the pooled intention-to-treat (ITT) estimate across the 2020-2023 placement cohorts was +2.2 percentage points (about 10% of the 22.3% control mean; 95% CI [+0.05, +4.33]), rising to +3.9 pp (about 17%; [+1.11, +6.68]) for the post-COVID 2022-2023 cohorts. Effects grew over time: at 36 months, the pooled ITT on the employment rate was +5.2 pp (about 11%; 95% CI [+1.10, +9.25]) -- comparable to the gains from hundreds of hours of intensive language training. Overall, the results provide rare field evidence that AI-based decision support can improve high-stakes public-sector allocation, offering a scalable, low-cost way to raise refugee employment.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in General Economics
Information Games: Strategic Crowding and Firm Repositioning in Language-Model Space
Representation Risk in Pretrained Image Encoders
Inherited Wage Dispersion and Optimal Discretion in a Dual-Rigidity TANK Model
PriceBench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Price, Quality, and Brand Preferences in LLM Booking Agents
Shared Models, Selective Trading, and Order Flow
Get the few papers worth your time in General Economics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.