arXiv preprint ·
How Well Can LLMs Simulate Real Learner Evaluations of Educational Feedback?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
While recent studies have explored human behavior and preference simulation using large language models (LLMs), it remains unclear how well LLMs can simulate subjective evaluations from real learners in educational settings. We investigate this question using real learner evaluation data on feedback for high-school biology questions at both the group and individual levels. We compare performance with and without learner-specific information, such as personality traits and evaluation examples, across six models. Our results show that LLMs still have a limited ability to simulate learner evaluations. Providing learner profiles and examples improves score calibration and individual-level simulation, but more often fails to improve group-level consistency. These findings highlight the need to investigate which learner information and adaptation strategies are effective for learner preference simulation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Steering Language Model Goals with Value Transplant
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: Systematically Erasing LLM's Memories
Counterexamples to Local Reconstruction Gain as a Proxy for Final Fidelity in Residual Completion
MemFold: Learning Compact Soft Memory for Long-Context Personalization via On-Policy Optimization
Who Gets a Token, and What Does It Carry? Unequal Name Support and Concept Access in Large Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.