arXiv preprint ·
Latency and accuracy tradeoffs in Spiking Neural Networks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Spiking neural networks are attractive for low-power speech command recognition, yet their latency has received far less attention than their energy efficiency, and their multi-timestep execution is widely assumed to make them slower than quantized neural networks. This paper challenges the assumption that more local timesteps necessarily imply higher network latency. By overlapping computation across adjacent layers at the timestep level, SNNs may complete execution in less time than comparable bit-serial QNNs. However, this overlap relies on spikes firing on incomplete inputs, and a spike once generated cannot be withdrawn, so its error persists and reduces accuracy. Waiting for more input before firing would seem to improve accuracy at the cost of reduced overlap. Yet we find and prove that this intuition fails at some layers, where even a small increase in waiting can change spike timing and downstream computation, making the network both slower and less accurate. We therefore propose a Pipeline Delay Search method which selects each layer's delay by balancing task-level accuracy gains against added network latency. We then adapt the selected configurations through spike-based quantization-aware training and bounded tuning of firing thresholds and initial membrane potentials. Together, these steps form Falcon, a framework for Fine-grained Analysis of Latency and Controlled firing which systematically analyzes and optimizes SNN latency under a spatial analog compute-in-memory mapping with shared digital engines. We evaluate Falcon on GSCV2 and SSC, achieving competitive accuracies of 96.31 and 83.02 at modeled network-core latencies of 119.64 and 124.00us, respectively. Together, our analysis and results show that SNNs can compute more yet finish faster, and wait longer yet predict worse, highlighting why Falcon matters for both latency and accuracy.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Vision--Language Signals in Constrained RL: Safety Gains Without Anticipation
Longer Records, Broader Invariance: The Hidden Scaling Problem in Longitudinal Contrastive Learning
Singularities of Non-negative Matrix Factorization and their application to Bayesian inference
FineART: Fine-Grained Annotated Robotic Trajectory Dataset and Vision-Language-Action Model for Bimanual Manipulation
Kafila: Serving Large Language Models on a Trusted Set of Heterogeneous Commodity Machines
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.