arXiv preprint ·

SubRot: Signed Gradient Subspace Calibration for VLM Rotation Quantization

Zhenhao Shang, Haizhao Jing, Haokui Zhang, Guoting Wei, Rong Xiao, Jianqing Gao and Peng Wang

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computer Vision

Abstract

Post-training quantization reduces the deployment cost of vision-language models (VLMs), but preserving multimodal capabilities at low bit widths remains challenging. Existing methods rely on modality- or token-level gradient statistics, which are susceptible to cross-sample variations in visual-to-textual token ratios and the positions of visual information, limiting statistical stability. Moreover, overly coarse aggregation through absolute values and averaging discards gradient signs and channel-wise differences, limiting the separation of modality-specific sensitivities. In contrast, the channel space provides a shared coordinate system across samples, making it a more natural basis for capturing stable task-sensitive structures. We therefore propose SubRot, a signed gradient subspace calibration method for VLM rotation quantization. Through eigendecomposition of the empirical Fisher matrix of activation gradients, SubRot identifies a sensitive channel subspace with three properties: cross-sample stability, clear sensitivity separation, and consistent signed effects on the autoregressive loss along certain directions. Guided by a local Taylor expansion, SubRot combines signed first-order guidance along sign-stable directions with second-order constraints along the remaining sensitive directions, while retaining MSE for overall reconstruction quality. This objective steers quantization errors toward loss-decreasing directions while controlling their magnitude. Experiments on five VLMs across five benchmarks show consistent average-score improvements over FlatQuant under W4A6 and W4A4, reaching 1.4 percentage points on LLaVA-NeXT-7B. Under W4A4, average accuracy degradation from FP16 remains within 1.4 percentage points across all evaluated models, while LLaVA-v1.5-13B exceeds its FP16 average score by 0.4 percentage points.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computer Vision

Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics