arXiv preprint ·
Separating personal from population gains when calibrating EEG foundation models for new users
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Foundation models are increasingly adapted to individual users, but an apparent personalization gain can simply reflect a stronger population model. This distinction matters for brain-computer interfaces, where every new user must be calibrated. We evaluated personal adaptation of three frozen EEG foundation models (CBraMod, REVE and LaBraM) in 235 held-out subjects from three motor-imagery datasets, comparing each subject's adapter with the population model and with adapters fitted to other subjects. Using all first-half session labels, personal adapters improved mean balanced accuracy over the population model by 1.5-5.4 percentage points and outperformed exchanged adapters by 2.3-7.3 points in all nine model-dataset combinations. The size of this benefit depended on population training: with four times the original budget, median gains remained positive (1.0-2.0 points) but were smaller for every model, and no population model reached a confirmed plateau. Acquiring the benefit cheaply was unreliable: few-label calibration was consistently non-negative on only one dataset, and in CBraMod neither unlabeled context nor meta-learned initialization outperformed matched controls. Personalization should therefore be evaluated against both a population reference and exchanged parameters, across population-training budgets.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
FAST-Brain: A Flow-Aligned Spatio-Temporal Surrogate Brain Model
Large-scale factor analysis shows machine intelligence is only partially interpretable
Neural Structural Reasoner: A Brain-inspired Architecture for Reasoning over Structured Knowledge
On the Limits of Metacognitive Monitoring in LLMs
From Neurons to Conversation: Speech Brain-Computer Interfaces
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.